[wg-e] Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and Outreach for pu...

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>]

hello YJ

i have had some discussions with other names council members and find that
many of us are working on very tight schedules to be able to facilitate the
time block necessary for the ICANN meeting. many are travelling and some on
holiday.

to that end i personally feel that it would be best to concentrate on making
the yokahama meeting as effective and am very interested in encouraging
active discussions in yokahama around the areas of global outreach and our
ongoing  budget issues.

with respect to the at-large membership elections... i personally feel that
it would not necessarily be appropriate
for the DNSO or names council in particular to take positions on at-large
membership election issues.

as an individual  member of the at-large body,   (my family & i use the
internet regularly for the many services and benefits it provides us as
individuals) , i am very interested in the process but feel that i can only
comment and participate in that area as an individual internet user with
that specific perspective .

i look forward to seeing you in yokahama and encourage agenda item proposals
for that meeting

my very best wishes


ken stubbs




----- Original Message -----
From: YJ Park <yjpark@aptld.org>
To: <KathrynKL@aol.com>; <council@dnso.org>
Cc: <wg-e@dnso.org>; <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and
Outreach for pu...


> Kathy wrote:
>
> > I would like to thank WG-E Co-Chairs Kilnam Chon and YJ Park,
> > and all of WG-E, for a job well done.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Taking this opportunity, I would like to propose a NC teleconference
> before Yokohama to discuss our agenda and further actions.
>
> Candidate Dates can be
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> I. June 29 Thursday any other choice for this week?
> II. July 6 Thursday any other choice for this week?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Understanding Ken, the chairman of Names Council,
> has been busy and many of us, too.
>
> Therefore, I am just submitting my informal
> agenda here for the coming teleconference.
>
> Regards,
>
> YJ
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                 Draft Agenda
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Roll Call
>
> 2. Agenda update
>
> 3.The relations between WGs and Names Council
>     based upon responses from WG-C.
>
>     Many(Some ?) Working Group C participants have expressed
>     NC reversed their own consensus which we didn't intend to.
>     The clarification is needed for the further working group's works
>     in this DNSO/ICANN process.
>
> 4. New Top Level Domains
>
>     According to April 18/19's NC's recommendation NC asked
>     the ICANN staff to invite expressions of interest from parties
>     seeking to operate any new gTLD registry.
>
>     However, the selection process is not clear enough in the ICANN
>     staff's document(http://www.icann.org/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#III
>     posted June 13) If my understanding is not correct,
>     please inform me of it.
>
>     Any recommendation from Names Council regarding this matter?
>
> 5. At Large Membership and Elections
>
>     No concern from NC?
>
> 6. Funding Issues.
>
> 7. AOB
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>                            [End of Message]
>