<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] constituency composition
Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> Let's throw this idea out immediately. We don't assign entire
> constituencies to individual organizations. If we start doing that,
> then let's have an ACM constituency, and IBM constituency, and a
> Syracuse University constituency (all of which have more members than > ISOC).
Agreed. And how about creating a new constituency for true
non-commercial domain name holders, since the current NCDNHC is
controlled by ISOC? At present, there is no constituency in which an
honest-to-god non-commercial domain name holder, whether individual
or organization, can function openly and effectively.
M.S.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|