ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] constituency composition


Milton Mueller wrote:
> 
> Let's throw this idea out immediately. We don't assign entire 
> constituencies to individual organizations. If we start doing that, 
> then let's have an ACM constituency, and IBM constituency, and a 
> Syracuse University constituency (all of which have more members than > ISOC).

Agreed. And how about creating a new constituency for true
non-commercial domain name holders, since the current NCDNHC is
controlled by ISOC? At present, there is no constituency in which an
honest-to-god non-commercial domain name holder, whether individual
or organization, can function openly and effectively.

M.S.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>