ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 4. General Assembly


At 09:55 PM 12/27/00, YJ Park wrote:
>General Assembly (GA):

I'd like to offer this as a priority ranking of these questions. Note that 
I've done some rewording, and re-phrased the question about the "future 
role of the GA" to a question about what it's function should be now - 
presumably, it would continue to perform that function in the future.

Is the function of the GA properly defined?

What should be the function of the GA?

How can the level of participation by GA members in the GA be improved?

How can the level of participation by constituency members in the GA be
improved?

If changes are made in the constituency structures, should the GA continue 
to exist?

If an individuals' constituency is created, should the GA continue to exist?


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>