ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Report requested by NC


At 11:16 AM 12/29/00, Kent Crispin wrote:

>Please note that the purpose of this WG is to identify ways to make
>the DNSO more productive.  That purpose is not at all served by trying
>to change the fundamental structure of the DNSO.

Unless the "fundamental structure of the DNSO" is part of the problem. Many 
people seem to think it is.

>  Instead, such attempts are certain to be disruptive in the extreme, and 
> to totally paralyze the
>DNSO.

Kent, it already appears paralyzed - that's part of the problem then, isn't it?

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>