[wg-review] role of the WG

["Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>]

Given our time limits, I think the best thing this WG can do is identify and carefully document problems, and make it clear to NC and the Board that these problems need to be addressed.

We can make general suggestions as to how to remedy the problems, but we should not confuse that with a redesign the DNSO. We don't have the time or the authority to do that. 

We don't even have to decide on a single, exclusive course of action. For example, whether we like constituencies or not. We can identify problems and report back: "some people say these problems are inherent in the constituency structure and propose to eliminate them altogether. other people say we need to add new constituencies. Others propose to redefine the process for creating constituencies, or restructure constituencies." 

If we try to come up with The One True Solution to the DNSO's problems we will not accomplish anything.

--MM