Re: [wg-review] 11 [IDNH] individual domain name owners, Report requested by ...

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

This WG has not the charter to propose such technology guidelines (an 
occasional need), but certainly to dertemine and make installed a permanent 
pole of competence and reporting to the BoD able to propose such guides 
lines when such needs arise.

This is why we must focus here on structural permanent questions. DNSO has 
failed. We want to make it a success, don't we?.

Jefsey

On 18:40 30/12/00, ZFASSETT@aol.com said:
>In a message dated 12/30/00 6:35:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, jo-uk@rcn.com
>writes:
>
><< 3. Which of ICANN's functions would you say it is appropriate for "real end
>  users" to comment on? >>
>
>Let me, if you will, expand upon this question a little further.  Increasing
>the TLD space is one of the functions of the ICANN that impacts all internet
>users - from technology experts to individual domain name holders. Does this
>working group at all look to address the enormous subjectivity that entered
>into the recent ICANN recommendations to the DoC?  Can this working group be
>of assistance in proposing the technology guidelines that would have the
>effect of minimizing such subjectivity of applications in the future?
>
>thanks,
>
>Ray Fassett