RE: [wg-review] 4. [GA] Report requested by NC

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I think that the GA is the single most important and under-represented organ
in the DNSO. Not only should the GA continue to exist, it should elect NC
seats directly. If the constituency system fails, as it has, the GA  is the
only viable fall-back. Otherwise, we have nothing and the DNSO implodes.
Without the GA, IMHO, the DNSO would have already imploded.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJ Park [mailto:yjpark@myepark.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 8:55 PM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] 4. [GA] Report requested by NC
> 
> 
> General Assembly (GA):
> 
> · What should the future role of the GA be?
> 
> · Is the function of the GA properly defined?
> 
> · How can the level of participation by constituency members 
> in the GA be
> improved?
> 
> · How can the level of participation by GA members in the GA 
> be improved?
> 
> · If changes are made in the constituency structures, and possibly an
> individual constituency added, should the GA continue to exist?
> 
> 
>