<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] 4. [GA] "Double representation" on the NC
The apparent strength of feeling that the GA should be represented on the
NC has not been adequately explored.
What would working group members see as the strengths and weaknesses of
this "double representation" structure?
How could the breadth of GA opinion be distilled to such an extent that
voting in the NC fairly represents such opinion?
Once the GA had teeth, how to prevent hijacking?
To what extent is the desire to see the GA represented on the NC motivated
by belief that the current constituencies are not in fact a complete
partition of interests, or - furthermore - that no such partition is
possible? (Karl ;-)
Andrew Moulden
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|