ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] 4. [GA] "Double representation" on the NC


The apparent strength of feeling that the GA should be represented on the 
NC has not been adequately explored.

What would working group members see as the strengths and weaknesses of 
this "double representation" structure?

How could the breadth of GA opinion be distilled to such an extent that 
voting in the NC fairly represents such opinion?

Once the GA had teeth, how to prevent hijacking?

To what extent is the desire to see the GA represented on the NC motivated 
by belief that the current constituencies are not in fact a complete 
partition of interests, or - furthermore - that no such partition is 
possible? (Karl ;-)

Andrew Moulden



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>