RE: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

There IS a constituency for individuals-

it is the At-Large!

and it now holds 5 seats on the ICANN Board.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Andrew Moulden
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:37 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests


It's high time I stopped lurking!

Firstly, I would wholeheartedly endorse Michael Sondow's thoughtful
critique of Jonathan Weinberg's article.

I wish to raise the issue of "partitioning" of interests. The existing
constituencies barely overlap, but I am concerned that the proposed IDNHC
must be seen as occupying a distinct place between the NCDNHC and IPC. The
second part of the NC's question has not been addressed: "Should there be a
constituency for individuals, and if so, how should its membership be
constituted?"

Andrew Moulden