ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction


On 09:51 AM 1/2/01, Ken Stubbs said:
>if this be the case then what legitimacy does any vote on a questions like
># 4 & # 8
> > Please remember that not all members of this WG are members of
> > constituencies. It's also conceivable that 80% of the votes are coming
>from GA members who have no other means of communicating their opinion in
> > something resembling a formal methodology.

One need not be in a constituency to have an impression of how they are 
working, obviously. Nor did I invent the questions - I believe that the 
substance of them came from the BoD, yes? It would be more useful if you'd 
addressed the method I suggested for dealing with constituency membership 
and those types of questions - would that work?


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>