Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposals - was Rough Proposals A - H?

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

I didn't think it was. It seems that creating confusion is a good tool to
keep you from accomplishing very much. They know how hard it is to keep up
with all of this. I doubt it was a mistake in choosing this format.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: "Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposals - was Rough
Proposals A - H?


> At 04:20 PM 12/31/00, Chris McElroy wrote:
> >Thanks Greg, but wouldn't a forum be better. I posted before. I can have
one
> >ready in 15 minutes with seperate topics.
>
> Forum vs mailing list is an interesting question. I tend to agree with you
> that forums would be better for working groups than mailing lists,
> particularly when there are this many people and this many ideas, but
> that's not the way the WG was structured.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html