Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Yes it is Andrew. I was wondering when I might hear from you. Welcome to the
party.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Moulden" <Andrew@FoolStop.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 5:37 AM
Subject: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests


> It's high time I stopped lurking!
>
> Firstly, I would wholeheartedly endorse Michael Sondow's thoughtful
> critique of Jonathan Weinberg's article.
>
> I wish to raise the issue of "partitioning" of interests. The existing
> constituencies barely overlap, but I am concerned that the proposed IDNHC
> must be seen as occupying a distinct place between the NCDNHC and IPC. The
> second part of the NC's question has not been addressed: "Should there be
a
> constituency for individuals, and if so, how should its membership be
> constituted?"
>
> Andrew Moulden
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html