Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

Per Karl A's comment to Kent, 4. the process is not producing adequate 
documents for the board

At 06:36 PM 1/2/01, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:
>Well, we have three on the list and a dissenting opinion on number 2. I
>posted number 2 to get us going, if no one will support it, we can remove
>it.
>
>DNSO Problem areas:
>1. Unrepresented constituents
>2. Unrepresentative constituencies
>3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties
>  with competing positions.
>
>--Rod
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html