RE: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Why am I asking?

Because, as you say, I may not qualify for this list, and I want to know for
sure.

peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Michael Sondow
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 12:58 AM
To: DNSO Review List
Subject: Re: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?


Peter de Blanc wrote:

> This WG is supposed to be DNSO review. Am I making the incorrect
assumption
> that all participants in the list are or should be  DNSO constituency
> members?
>
> Are there any "qualifications" required to participate?
>
> What are the rules?

Why are you asking, Mr. de Blanc? Are there some contributors whose
posts you don't like, and you think to use some "rules" to have them
eliminated?

Perhaps it is you who don't belong on the list, since you are a
member of the NC, which is supposed to receive the wg's report, not
write it.

M.S.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html