<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?
1/4/01 12:38:17 AM, "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> wrote:
>This WG is supposed to be DNSO review. Am I making the incorrect assumption
>that all participants in the list are or should be DNSO constituency
>members?
Here's what the ICANN announcement says:
"ICANN's Names Council
Renews Call for Wide Consultation on Consensus Building
December 21, 2000 - To get additional input
into a review of its own consensus-building procedures, the Names
Council of ICANN's Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO)
at its December 19 meeting established a Review Working Group
charged with actively seeking input from the widest possible
set of Internet stakeholders.
The new working group, chaired by Names
Council member Y J Park, is established immediately and seeks
to complete its work by January 15th 2001. In common with previous
DNSO work groups, the group is open to anyone to participate
and operates by e-mail. Interested parties are encouraged to
sign-up now by sending an email to majordomo@dnso.org with the words subscribe wg-review in the body of the message."
But don't take it from me... visit the page yourself: http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr21dec00.htm
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|