<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?
On 10:16 PM 1/3/01, Sotiropoulos said:
>1/4/01 12:38:17 AM, "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> wrote:
>
> >This WG is supposed to be DNSO review. Am I making the incorrect assumption
> >that all participants in the list are or should be DNSO constituency
> >members?
>Here's what the ICANN announcement says:
>... the group is open to anyone to participate
> and operates by e-mail.
As opposed to:
>On 12:02 PM 12/27/00, YJ Park said:
>[Issue 2] In the terms of reference which was circulated on Dec 23,
>only GA and 7 constituencies members can be on the WG.
>At-Large members can be invited, though.
Regards.
Greg
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|