<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Does ontogeny recapitulate philogeny? (was Re: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?)
Michael, I do not agree with your statement.
The DNSO, Domain Name Supporting Organization, should include all
stakeholders in Domain Names.
peter de Blanc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Michael Sondow
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:44 AM
To: DNSO Review List
Subject: Does ontogeny recapitulate philogeny? (was Re: [wg-review] who
is a legitimate member of this list?)
The DNSO is supposed to be an agglomeration of all Internet
stakeholders. Therefore, this list should include all and any
Internet stakeholders, so that the defective constituency structure,
which doesn't include them all, can be repaired.
Anything else is just a reaffirmation of a defective system.
M.S.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|