Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - eliminate NC, keepconstituencies

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

But . . . But . . .  It makes too much sense. Very good Harald.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic


----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - eliminate
NC, keepconstituencies


> At 07:02 AM 1/4/01, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> >Trying to think outside the box, one could imagine wanting a structure
where:
> >
> >- The process of getting sensible proposals before the governing body
> >   allows open participation, and allows the creation of expert groups to
form
> >   those recommendations based on qualifications, NOT representativity
>
> Yes! both/and. One reason I like the concept of rather open "formal
> constituencies" and working groups is that they can naturally deal with
> issues within their realm of competence. The other reason I like the
> concept of easily formed working groups is that if a reasonably sized
group
> doesn't like the direction of one WG, they could form their own and issue
a
> counter paper. Under the current structure, which promotes adversarial
> relations rather than consensus, it's very difficult for any coherent
> position(s) to be adequately stated for evaluation.
>
> >- An action could be adopted only with a significant consensus of
interests
> >- Any action could be blocked by a significant grouping of interests, but
> >   NOT by representatives of a single interest acting alone
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html