Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

["Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>]

Greg has made a valid point about the process of consensus building and the
needs for expertise in that process. It is an easy point with which to
agree. The point concerns the expertise of individuals.

I therefore do not see how this is connected with the contention that the NC
is "structural impediment to consensus" unless this is a reference to the
inadequate way DNSO WGs function.

What is flawed is current practice with WGs (all WGs). A WG which is
unstructured in its debate on a series of issues, which has no sanction for
personal attacks or off topic postings and which does not work methodically
from issue to issue against a given deadline, is a part of a structural
problem.

Improve the structure for consensus building in combination with chairmen
chosen for their expertise in chairing and we will improve.

Philip Sheppard (in his individual capacity).


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html