<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
...
> Why people wave "consenus" as some sort of high and mighty
thing of
> angelic goodness is beyond me.
>
> I consider "consensus" to be synonymous with "not
accountable" and
> suggestive of back room dealings and hidden agendas.
>
> Let's dispense with new-age warm and fuzzy thinking about
> "consensus" and simply run the DNSO the way that normal
community
> groups, businesses, and governments work -- with well
stated rules
> of order and clear cut voting on clear cut issues.
Hee hee. Exactly correct.
Sorry, o thou great Consensus Experts.
Clear issues + votes is what people will understand.
Don't trust anybody with an agenda.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|