Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

[ERIC@HI-TEK.COM]

Please note that the congessional model requires a consensus of opinions within
committee in order to put forth a clear statement of proposed law, which may
then be voted upon.  Without the consensus as to how to word the bill to be
voted upon there can be no clear cut vote.
Sincerely,

Eric wrote:

> My mistake, it was my understanding that DNSO had specifically stated that
> the consensus model was what we were to use to develop our final report.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:12 AM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org; kent@songbird.com; eric@springbreaktravel.com
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
>
> No, we don't "have to" work with it. And the problem,  is that no one seems
> to know what it (consensus) means anyway. I agree with Karl. Well-stated
> rules, clear-cut votes on clearly stated issues. That's the way to proceed.
>
> >>> "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> 01/05/01 10:58AM >>>
>
> Regardless of how any of us feel about consensus, it is the structure that
> that we have to work with for this WG.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html