Re: [wg-review] [Agenda] Issues List - 4

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

I'm in total agreement with doing that too Greg. Have been for some time
now, but every time I get all comfy that we have a list someone creates a
new one. Now in my Board meetings we don't ignore the Chair. Here people
make it a common practice to do so. I, personally would like for Miss Park
to qualify the list of questions as it now stands. Greg, I nominated you for
co-chair and if that works out I'm fine with either you or Miss Park guiding
those questions.

And I'm glad you appreciate the humor I find in these proceedings from time
to time.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic


----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: "Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] [Agenda] Issues List - 4


> At 08:25 PM 1/5/01, Chris McElroy wrote:
> >All I want to know is do I now have the whole collection or do these come
in
> >sets of 4, 5, 6, or more? When collecting I always try to get the
complete
> >set.
> >
> >Can we maybe focus on deciding what topics ARE going to be up for
discussion
> >by this WG? Or do I need to start a working group on that too?
>
> *apologizes after he stops laughing* Sorry, Chris, this was a list that
was
> developed following Milton's suggestion that we decide on the MAJOR issues
> before really settling down to hashing out alternatives.
>
> *fans his sheets of foolscap* "pick a list, any list....."
>
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html