<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [Clarification] Re: [wg-review] [Agenda] Issues List - 4
While I cannot speak to the accuracy of reports derived from some sources, I
can say that jefsey does reflect 'my' confusion accurately.
<yofelipe> tries to keep 'dumb' comments to minimum and learn maximum when
with the 'big boys & girls'
-------------------
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 02:03:32 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> Dear Elisabeth,
> Welcome on this WG-Review: another NC Member joining the WG-Review
> which is supposed to report to the NC. Soon the WG-Review will be an
> extended NC so we will by-pass the Task Force but we will gain delays:
> we will report together to the BoD. Time galore!
>
> On 19:46 06/01/01, Elisabeth Porteneuve said:
> >Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >Let me clarify some innaccurate items in the long message attached
> >below.
>
> I understand the only "inaccurate item" is that you are not the Scribe.
>
> I never said you were, I talked about your report; as it was not signed
and
> I suppose that as the NC Secretary - ie. legally responsible - you do as
> every elect Secretary Officer in any association and corporation: you
> review the minutes of the meetings which are published by your office.
> No offense was meant. To the countrary the acknowledgement of your
> office and responsibility. (This report show you stil assume them until
> un replacement has been found).
>
> >First of all, I did not drafted the minutes from the Names Council
> >held on 19 December -- Maca Jamin was our Scribe, and she desserves
> >our gratitude to do her work very well.
> >Since last October when I get elected to the Names Council by
> >the ccTLD Constituency I do not take minutes by myself, to avoid any
> >possible conflict of interest.
>
> Now we know that Mrs. Jamin has kindly played the role of Scribe, we
> certainly join you in thanking her for her help. Hi, Maca: happy new
year!
>
> >Secondly, the NC minutes report all the long debate about the DNSO
Review,
> >but end with the DECISION D4, submitted to the NC vote, and adopted.
> >Therefore this DECISION stands as the basis for the WG-Review.
> >Please focus on that topics, as the timeline is indeed very short.
>
> I do not see were there may be any "inaccuracy" here. This WG-Review
> is in operation since 12/20/2000. As documented Mrs. YJ Park Chairs it
> to general satisfaction of the Members. She is our interface with the
NC.
> The DNSO/Secretariat report of the 12/19 meeting has been only
> published today (and not sent to this WG-Review which includes @large
> members not on dnso-annouce).
>
> It gives some indications and calls for clarifications about the requests
of
> Mr. Philip Sheppard to change the direction of this WG-Review in apparent
> disagreement with our WG-Review Chair. As Members we are only
> interested in our Chair. But since NC Chair, NC Coordination with
> our Chair, NC Secretary and NC Members are themselves participating as
> any other Members of this WG-Review and that we are told to be in the
> "dark' if we proceed as initiated by our Chair, you may understand we are
> confused.
>
> >Some URLs relevant to the DNSO Review process are recapitulated below.
>
> I am sorry, but we are not competent to decide how they fit together.
This
> is the task of our Chair and of Mr. Philip Sheppard coordinating directly
> with her outside of this forum.
>
> >There is a lot of substantial messages sent to this list which I have
> >been browsing today, I will send my comments in a separate message.
>
> We will certainly be interested in reading them. But please understand
> that the confusion entertained by all these different positions from the
NC
> is an important element for us to understand why the DNSO is not
> efficient under the current NC formula.
>
>
> Dear Elsabeth, I certainly accept that the word "inaccurate" was probably
a
> typo as:
>
> 1. you did not indicate anything inaccurate
> 2. my memo is only the accurate description of the confusion we are in as
> WG-Reviw goodwill Members and a request for clarification.
>
> All the best to you.
> Jefsey
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|