Re: [wg-review] View from here -- who pays for ICANN

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

> I wonder if you might be able 
> to tell us which 4 constituencies do not pay anything to ICANN?

The information about who pays for ICANN is publicly available.
The ICANN President's Task Force on Funding main document is in:
http://www.icann.org/tff/tff.htm
Whereas the initial TFF did prepare the budget for ICANN Fiscal Year
1999-2000 (July 1999 to June 2000), this budget was re-conducted
as it for ICANN Fiscal Year 2000-2001.

Elisabeth Porteneuve
--
Quoting para C.:

   C. Aggregate shares among classes of ICANN constituents

   The Task Force recommends that continuing revenue requirements
   to support ICANN's transition budget for FY99-00 (July 1, 1999
   to June 30, 2000) be allocated among the name and address
   registries and registrars according to the formula set forth below.
   In making this recommendation the Task Force accompanies it with
   the caveat that although it believes these proportional shares
   are fair and appropriate to the current circumstances of ICANN
   and the registry/registrar communities, any such formula requires
   scrutiny over time, and it assumes that this recommendation will
   be reviewed in connection with development of the ICANN budget
   for FY00-01, commencing in the spring of 2000. Further, the
   Task Force notes that due to parallel processes operating with
   respect to its own work, the negotiations among ICANN, NSI and the
   USG over pending contract agreements, and the development of ICANN's
   revised budget projection for the current fiscal year, the
   percentages used herein are subject to rounding and interpolation
   as applied to specific agreements to be executed following
   Board action on the recommendations of the Task Force.

   gTLD registrars and registry = 55%

   - gTLD registrars = 50%

   - gTLD registry = 5%

   ccTLD registries = 35%

   IP address registries = 10%

--
> From sotiris@hermesnetwork.com Mon Jan  8 01:04 MET 2001
> Message-Id: <200101080004.TAA15062@sunflare.ccs.yorku.ca>
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 18:58:04 -0500
> To: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>,
>         wg-review@dnso.org
> From: Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] View from here
> 
> 1/8/01 12:13:53 AM, Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr> wrote:
> 
> >Actually, 90 percent of ICANN revenues comes from three among seven
> >DNSO Constituencies (four of them does not pay anything to ICANN)
> >and the DNSO is the only one Supporting Organization with a GA open
> >to everybody. It shall deserve some consideration.
> 
> Needles to say, the lion's share of ICANN revenues ultimately come 
> from IDNHs who register and/or renew their domains.  
> I wonder if you might be able 
> to tell us which 4 constituencies do not pay anything to ICANN?
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html