[wg-review] Fw: [nc-review] Re: Working Group report

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Hello all,

Let me remind your position paper schedule of this working group.

=======================================
Jan 5 - Jan 9:
Call for Position Paper on each topic, 13 topics until Jan 9.
=======================================

Due to this group's limited discussion on 13 topics under limited time,
I have made two requests to NC and especially chair of NC
review Task Force. First, let review working group submit its
progress report especially regarding constituencies and possibly
others if wg can have enough responses from members.

Second, let review working group have enough working days
which has been seconded by Peter(Feb. 20) in the NC list.

FYI, I attached the below message to nc-review task force and nc.


----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
Cc: <nc-review@dnso.org>; "'names council'" <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:31 AM
Subject: [nc-review] Re: Working Group report


> Hello Theresa,
>
> > I hope that you had a good holiday, and that all is well.
>
> Thank you for your consideration and hope you had a good one, too.
> As I told you in my earlier message, I was supposed to have my long-
> waiting holidays from Dec. 21 until Jan 7 which has made me neither
> work on review working group properly nor have true-sense holidays.
>
> > This note is just to remind you in your capacity as the Chair of the
> Review
> > Working Group that the report is due on January 15th. The Working Group
> > report should address the issues under the Working Groups mandate as
> > contained in the announcement of the working group December 21, 2000.
The
> > report should also include any relevant documentation to support it's
> > conclusions. As The Task Force will of course also look at the Working
> Group
> > archives, but the report submitted should include all relevant material.
>
> The approval to join review working group requests have been made up to
> around 300 and 100 or so out of them unsubscribed to the list due to
> overwhleming traffic.
>
> Taking advantage of this, I want to show my sincere respects to those
> who have participated in this process despite their holidays.
>
> The Review Task Force's questionaire was circulated in the form of 10
> subtitles on Dec 27 and three new subjects were added to this by members.
>
> Currently, the discussion has focused on specifically structure -
> constituencies
> along with funding issues and fundamental question about decision-making
> process
> - consensus or majority votes ....
>
> > The final DNSO Review report submitted to ICANN will, of course, include
> all
> > relevant documentation  as a package accompanying the Report. I have
> > attached the reminder note on schedule as well, for your convenience.
>
> Theresa, can I suggest review working group submit its progress review
> report
> to the Names Council especially regarding "constituencies" on January 15th
> since
> this is the issue which seems to have its substantial responses from the
> members.
>
> > Thank you for all your hard work as Chair of the Review Working Group.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation as chair of Review TF regarding this
process,
> I once again ask you and Names Council to reconsider extending its working
> days which can make members come up with true-sense report abiding by
> the procedural rules.
>
> Thank you and regards,
> YJ
>
> > Look forward,
> >
> > and kind regards,
> >
> > Theresa
> >
> >
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html