ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] I am confused



A couple of points:

1. Formalized procedures of discussion were not tried in the GA while I
was there.

2. "Consensus" mechanisms as I define them are the absence of mechanisms
to require counted votes when any member objects to the chair's finding.

3. As for people who don't participate - there's no system to handle that
except by the appointment of entities or people that are effectively
guardians.  I personally find that to be an extreme step, particularly in
the absence of until fully open procedures that allow everyone to fully
participate.

		--karl--





--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>