ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] The ICANN membership hoax


On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Michael Sondow wrote:

> Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> > Wow Karl!  Talk about dropping a bomb.
>
> Isn't it about time the people on this list woke up to reality? Here
> is what the ICANN bylaws say about "members" (@large and otherwise):
>
> http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#II

I believe that ICANN *does* have members under California law.
See my discussion at:
	http://www.cavebear.com/icann-board/platform.htm#full-members



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>