[wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS]

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

> 4. I repeat my motion which has now been seconded by several Members:
>
> "
> The WG-Review has observed that reaching a consensus within the DNSO was
> basically hampered by the lack of definition and therefore of common
> understanding of what a DNSO consensus is and how it is determined
> "

From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>; "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decisions preparation
by consensus, Report requested by Members

OK! I withdraw my suggestion on merging this issue with the existing topics
or
on deferring this issue after Jan 15th.

> The common target would to offer and maintain to the advantage of the
> whole
> ICANN community a real experience and qualification about consensus
> building and achievement. So it will practical serve te DNSO, the NC and
> the ICANN.

However, it would be much appreciated to see something substantial such
as how to establish "consenus-building process" watchdog system through
both outside and inside mechanism.

Thanks,
YJ

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html