<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] Please submit your proposal for DNSO Review
> We could start by using such definitions in our own WG report.
It's time to sort the issues out.
Waiting for the proposals to come in, I draw some draft structure.
1. Appreciating Jonathan Weinbeger who has responded to NC
Review TF questionaire which was formally requested by NC
on Dec. 19, I do submit his comments as one of proposals.
2. Do we need Constituency?
3. If we need, how to create New Constituencies?
4. Individual Domain Name Holders Constituency Needs recognition.
5. How can we achieve or measure "Consensus"?
6. Money Talks in DNSO/ICANN?
Please send your proposals!!
Thanks,
YJ
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|