ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Consensus - and broken questions on the polling booth


At 09:55 9/01/01 +0100, you wrote:
>1) I am in favour of the creation of an individual domain name registrant's 
>constituency. The polling booth insists that I have to take a position on 
>whether I am in favour of them being holders or owners, something I think 
>is irrelevant at this juncture.
>

Harald and other voters,
The topic has beeen set up so to allow people to remain neutral on Holder/Owner:
If you favour the constituency, but do not have any opinion on the Name,
just tick both.
No insistence, just data gathering.

-Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>