RE: [wg-review] [IDNH] Criteria for Membership
Yes, Great
job…and a good starting point. Michael Michael Gendron.. Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Business CCSU 860-437-8322 mgendron75@home.com -----Original
Message----- Very
nice. I somehow knew you would have this done in good time. :) Comments below. Chris McElroy
aka NameCritic -----
Original Message -----
To: Jefsey Morfin ; Karl Auerbach ; J J
Teernstra ; david@farrar.com
Sent: Monday, January 08,
2001 5:49 PM Subject: [wg-review]
[IDNH] Criteria for Membership Proposal for Criteria for Membership of DNSO/IDNH ( Basic
Model a - a direct GA of individual domain name holders ) 1.1.IDNH
constituency membership is open to any person who is an individual domain name
holder 1.1 An
Individual Domain Name Holder is any person who can demonstrate a
level of control over a specified domain name that a reasonable
person would conclude grants the individual person
the exclusive legal right to exploit the specified domain name worldwide
subject to applicable laws. 1.2
Examples of items that may be submitted in support of an application include
but are not limited to (i) evidence
of applicants name on domain contact information (ii)
evidence of applicant's funds used to pay registration fees, if any (iii)
evidence that the applicant may cause the domain name to be relinquished (iv)
evidence that the applicant is the beneficial holder of any domain
name that is registered or operated by a third party (v) Where
the applicant does not hold direct control over the domain
name, written evidence must be provided that the controlling party is
acting on instructions of the beneficial holder and that such
instructions may be withdrawn at the applicants sole discretion. ADDITIONAL
RULES 1.3 An
individual shall not be entitled to more than one membership of IDNH 1.4
Where there is more than one holder of a single domain, that
domain would not meet criteria for membership. (Please
elaborate here a little, unless 1.5 is the clarification) 1.5 No
single domain name may be used to support membership of more than one
individual. 1.6 The
domain name used to meet criteria for membership shall not be a
top level domain name or a reserved second level Domain name in registries
where this level is not open for individual registration. (There
are now registries or so-called registries claiming to register .biz.com and
other nonsense. You mean to exclude that as a domain, right? The owner or
holder of biz.com would be eligible, but not something.biz.com, correct? Just
clarifying that) 1.7. Membership
is subject to approval by the Committee (i)
The Committee shall be elected by the membership of the IDNH (ii)
Such committee shall examine the totality of the facts.
(iii) Decisions of the committee are final.
(iv) The membership committee shall have three members. (Should
there be an appeal to a larger body instead of decisions are final? That would
eliminate the types of power grabs we seek to eliminate, IMO) 1.9 A
person who is a member of another DNSO constituency shall not be
eligible for full membership of IDNH, but may be invited to contribute to
from time to time as guest, advisor or consultant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Joanna Great
job Joanna!
|