Re: [wg-review] [IDNO] OR [IDNH] addendum

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/9/01 10:45:54 PM, Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org> wrote:

>Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>> Actually, I was just being facetious... the beast has many faces.  The clear disrepancy between the term "owner" at the outset and this subsection
>> (among other statements) in this company's agreement, may get them > into hot water at some point.
>
>Hot water? Why? These are merely transcribed parts of ICANN's
>Registrar Accreditation Agreement, that all registrars are obliged
>to sign. Just one of the many documents written by the corporation
>you are so proud to belong to.

Michael, 

I have not read every registrar Agreement out there, but this is the only one I've run across which uses the term "owner" to describe the relation of the 
Registrant to a given domain.  If you know of others, I'd like to read them.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.

P.S.  I don't think I said that I was "proud" of ICANN... in fact I'm certain I didn't.  I'm many things about ICANN, "proud" is not one of them.  Although I'd 
like to be... if they were to fly straight, I just might be.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html