<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC, Chair prior to co-Chair elections
- To: wg-review@dnso.org
- Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC, Chair prior to co-Chair elections
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:11:31 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <sa5c907a.086@gwia201.syr.edu>; from Milton Mueller on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:40:01PM -0500
- Mail-Followup-To: wg-review@dnso.org
- References: <sa5c907a.086@gwia201.syr.edu>
- Sender: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:40:01PM -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> Now we have Kent Crispin, antitrust law expert!
No, we have Milton Mueller, being an expert jerk.
I am certainly not an anti-trust law expert. But, interestingly enough,
Joe Sims, ICANN's outside counsel, is.
It is the case that a primary legal concern (perhaps THE primary legal
concern) in the formation of ICANN was how to avoid anti-trust action --
if things went as envisioned, ICANN would be the single controller for
access to two unique resources -- the central root dns registry, and the
central IP address registry. This is a pure monopoly.
Without ICANN (or some similar agent -- perhaps a government), the
registries would have to manage the central allocation of these
resources themselves, which would make THEM the object of anti-trust
scrutiny (or at least increase the level of scrutiny).
IF (and I say "if") ICANN convinces government anti-trust authorities
that it's management of these resources passes muster from an
anti-trust point of view, then the registries don't have to worry about
it -- or at least their worries are lessened. This off-loading of
worry is a service that ICANN potentially provides to registries; and
it is this service that I fancifully called an "anti-trust product".
> It's pretty humorous,
> but way too off-topic to pursue. I would encourage others on this list
> to discount what he has to say on the topic pretty thoroughly. Just
> let's say the concept of a private corporation selling an "anti-trust
> shield product" without any special exemption from government
> would...uh...raise a few eyebrows at the Justice Department.
Obviously you can't recognize a metaphor when you see it. In any case,
Joe Sims worked at the Justice Department...
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|