Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH Vote now - all those in favor

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Thank you.

Joanna Lane wrote:

> Dear members,
> I agree with David's comments below, but surely somebody will counteract and
> thus we are all blocked.
> The fundamental issue is whether or not individuals need representation in
> DNSO.
> If we believe that it is, the bottom line is that we have to demonstrate
> some progress is being made towards that end, whatever that may be, however
> imperfect that may be, as fulfilling one of the duties of this WG.
> I call upon members to set aside semantics and definitions for a moment and
> to consider using the privileged position in which we find ourselves here to
> effect change by using action, not words. The polling booth question
> relating to this issue was unfortunately divisive, but I don't think it
> would do any harm to take a "snapshot" using this email list to determine
> all those in favor and against the general idea at this moment in time for
> the record.
>
> The phrase "along the lines of" can be useful when the essence of a creative
> idea needs to be conveyed whilst implying further development will be
> required to determine the exact form. It's use seems appropriate in the
> context of this issue.
>
> This is the first of two versions of this email I am sending to the list and
> ask you please to reply to one of these by putting an X in the box. Both
> pose the same question. If you want to vote no, do not reply to this email.
>
> QUESTION: "Do you support representation for individuals in DNSO along the
> lines of a new "constituency " ?
>
> YES [    X     ]
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Regards,
> Joanna Lane
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of DPF
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 1:04 PM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH Centers of Interest
>
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:31:42 +0100, Robin Miller wrote:
>
> >> The 200 odd members of the CA/IDNO support the term owners.
> >
> >I don't support the term. I guess that makes it 199 odd members. I remember
> not
> >being alone in my opinion. So strike a few more from the 199.
>
> For the record I prefer the term holder to owner also (and am a member
> of IDNO).  Domain Names are not sold by registries because if they
> were that would imply registries owned the names in the first place
> before selling them.
>
> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard