RE: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

["Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <MarshM@diebold.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff,
NC,
> TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:56:39PM -0800, Karl Auerbach wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > 
> > > Fine.  So you bring a suit against the board for not following
its
> > > bylaws.  You get an injunction against the board not following
the
> > > bylaws.  The board amends the bylaws and proceeds with what it
was
> > > going to do.
> > >
> > > So what is the remedy?
> > 
> > The remedy is injunctive relief.
> 
> Yes, that is what the word "injunction" above refers to, I imagine.
> 
> > Can the board amend the articles/bylaws? 

Oh come now, Kent.  Any competent attorney would include, as a measure
of the potential injunction, a stay against changes to the bylaws. 
Karl's point is quite valid, in spite of your insistance that it is
not.

> 
> That was stipulated in my question: "the board amends...".  So your 
> answer is, I guess, "none".
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQA/AwUBOl9BK3KYiraY8fZCEQLTdACfYEmZnNr2MSfdySMA2M5e+V33w3IAnRdU
ux/WiUxWgq8DZBJpg8rEr2lM
=CN1V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html