Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

["'Kent Crispin'" <kent@songbird.com>]

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:15:17PM -0500, Judith Oppenheimer wrote:
> > One of the real concerns here is that you explicitly don't want to
> > create a constituency that consists of a small group people who care
> > deeply about some issue, because that is intrinsically unbalanced.  An
> > organization with 35 million members is certainly going to give a more
> > balanced view of things than an organization with 200 members all of
> > whom are very concerned about some single set of issues.
> 
> You mean like the BC's 65 members' (below) dogmatic focus on

If you don't like it, that's purely your fault.  You could have joined
and argue against it, but you didn't. 

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html