ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

  • To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
  • Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections
  • From: "Bret A. Fausett" <baf@fausett.com>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:29:00 -0800
  • In-Reply-To: <B684B6FC.7400%baf@fausett.com>
  • Sender: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
  • User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

DPF wrote:
> This is also claimed to be the reason not many are involved directly
> with the Business Constituency.  So the ICC and Chmabers of Commerces
> suffer from the same problem as the Business Constituency.

So join the B&C Constituency and make the ICC irrelevant. Under the B&C
charter, international businesses and associations get 3 votes. SMEs get 1
vote. Just 3 small businesses with your views would counter the views of the
ICC. 

The application form is here:
http://www.bcdnso.org/form.htm

        -- Bret

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>