RE: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

To all:
Yes we can go ahead with what Greg Burton said.
The nominated will also help. If a Chair of the CIs cannot yet repond fully 
(oar has not been agreed yet by the CI), I commited to YJ I would at least 
list the concerns as listed from the motions reported Chaire with some 
explanations and what you will explicitely send under the Subject name.
Jefsey


On 02:08 12/01/01, Greg Burton said:
>At 05:35 PM 1/11/01, Joanna Lane wrote:
>>Where is our Chair by the way? (I notice email is not being delivered).
>
>She's having some kind of problem with her domain, I guess....more than 
>mildly ironic.
>
>>What is happening about debating and answering the NC questionnaire, if
>>anything?
>
>I proposed people take the segments that YJ divided the questions into and 
>turn them into polls at pollcat.com. This meets the task force needs, and 
>can be done rapidly.
>
>>Do we need a schedule for this WG?
>
>No - we need volunteers to turn a chunk of the questions into a poll where 
>possible. I'm working on the NC questions and consensus questions right 
>now, and hope to have those up tonight.
>
>The poll for 3. constituencies is still at 
>http://www.pollcat.com/ty0p1puu4w_a with results at 
>http://www.pollcat.com/report/ty0p1puu4w_a . If you haven't taken it, 
>please do - it will give quick answers to those questions, and I would 
>hope that more than the current 20 respondents will use it.
>
>The poll for 4. GA is still at http://www.pollcat.com/ty0p41u8xq_a with 
>results at http://www.pollcat.com/report/ty0p41u8xq_a . Again, if you 
>haven't taken it please do - only 3 people have so far.
>
>
>>Who is doing proposals as per YJ and what form do they take?
>
>It would also be useful, for each of us who care to, to discuss 
>impressions of the process as gone through here, perhaps a personal essay. 
>These could be incorporated into the larger, later, report.
>
>>Does the questionnaire have to be completed by Monday, or is the proposed
>>completion date now February 2Oth?
>
>I'd REALLY like to see us do it now, and then focus on the 
>non-questionnaire issues afterwards. There is NO reason we can't do this - 
>pick an area you will take, turn it into a poll, publish the poll URL 
>here, and report the results on Monday evening. Or leave the poll up so 
>that people can continue to respond, and let Theresa and Philip have 
>access to your poll account so that they can look at the text answers.
>
>But as usual, that's just me.
>
>Regards,
>Greg
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html