[wg-review] Re: A Reply to Miles B. Whitener... Part 2

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/13/01 2:11:38 AM, Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:

>1/12/01 12:47:39 PM, "Miles B. Whitener" <mbw@i-theta.com> wrote:

>>  Any valid consideration of the concerns of anybody who does not
>>own any of the Internet will flow from the good will of those who
>>do.  

America's "goodwill" has become more than increasingly evident in the state of world affairs today.  So, we're to get the drippings from the "Masters" 
table, huh?  Excuse me for saying so, but that is foolish.  Please look up the dictionary definition of "foolish", I mean it in its fullest sense.  

>>If such considerations are forced from the owners, they will
>>divest themselves to the extent that they have any alternatives.

That will never happen!

>>And remember that one alternative is to simply cease to be
>>engaged in anything.  You can kill me, but you can't make me work
>>as your slave!

People like you make bad workers anyway, friend.  You've been here how long, lurking in this discussion List?  This is what you have to offer?

>>  Now, having stated the truth, I wonder if there's anybody on
>>this list who agrees.  

I have not seen anyone yet...

>>For reasons I don't know, most folk I
>>encounter in these groups are one kind of socialist or another.

Maybe because you flippantly paint them as such?  take off the blinders!

>>  Flame away!

How about a `blue flame'?

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html