ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections


On 16:12 12/01/01, Kent Crispin said:
> > I think we "may have a problem" here David.
>The problem is that small businesses haven't joined.  The problem is
>*not* that there isn't a place for them in the dnso.

As you may recall. I am the only one active, there!
I tour the place to find others joining me and they respond ...
what does that bring to me?

> > I'm actually surprised at your statement...  you didn't see this list
> > in Judith's earlier post?
>
>In that list you will find that the International Chamber of Commerce.
>The ICC represents an enormous number of small businesses -- one figure
>I saw was 35000000 businesses worldwide.  Membership of the ICC is open
>to small businesses, including sole proprietorships, and, of course,
>small businesses make up the bulk of the members.

The General Secretary of the ICC was nominated candidate to the ICANN
@large election. We say ... here presse attaché. We kept her informed
with hundredth of mails... no reponse....

Clearly the ICANN and DNSO are *not* an attractive topics, even though
the ICC has identified the interest/

>However, this brings up an important point concerning the basic
>structural nature of ICANN/DNSO.  Clearly, the absolutely overwhelming
>majority of the 35 million members of the ICC simply don't have time or
>interest to devote to participating in ICANN.  To *almost everyone*,
>domain names are in fact a microscopic specialized policy concern, and
>they would much rather leave it to some organization to represent them.

Definitly all the more than those who "knows" think that their Local NIC
is the right place to handle it and the ICANN is the International
Cooperative Association of National Nics ...

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>