ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Drop constiuencies altogether




I agree with Roeland as well. Tack my name to this list.

all the best, Robin

Marcia Lynn wrote:
> 
> I also agree with Roeland Meyer.
> --Marcia Lynn
> 
> >
> > > I support Roeland,
> >
> > As do I.
> >
> > > On 09:36 13/01/01, Roeland Meyer said:
> > > >I still see some with the mistaken hope that the constituency system
> can be
> > > >repaired. IMHO, it can't. However, they are so intricatly woven
> throughout
> > > >the current DNSO structure that the only way to eliminate them is to
> re-wire
> > > >the DNSO. I have submitted documents that can begin to do that.
> >
> > --karl--
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>