RE: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

I agree with this cahne. I would also change "unorganized" to
"disorganized"...just a point of grammar...:-)
Joanna

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of INFOELINK
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:55 AM
To: Cindy Merry; wg-review@dnso.org
Cc: DPF
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,
TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections


can we make
>1. an unorganized jumble of all Internet users' diverse interests
read
>1. an unorganized GROUP of all Internet users' diverse interests
in the report

Kwami

* Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) is an
organization that addresses the benefits and risks to society resulting
from the use of computers.  For information and to become a member of CPSR,
please visit our Web page at
http://www.cpsr.org


> >The @large is
> >1. an unorganized jumble of all Internet users' diverse interests.
> >2. without Charter or Mission statement
> >3. without means of the members to contact each other
> >4. subject to a Study that may reduce its representation on the Board or
> do
> >away with it altogether
> >5. represented by Directors that may be representing interests directly
> >opposed to typical DN holders' interests.
> >6. top-down and controlled by ICANN staff.
> >7. Unable to provide policy formulations to the ICANN Board
> >
> >An Individual Domain Name Owners constituency is:
> >
> >1. formed naturally by people with a common interest-- bottom up and in
> >control of its own Charter and destiny
> >2. part of the DNSO where Domain  Name Policy initiatives are developed
> >3. a place where any Domain Name Owner gets a chance to be part of the
> >policymaking process, (and get the results to the attention of the Board)
> >via its own elected officers
> >4. a counterweight in the DNSO, giving it an opportunity to be
> considerably
> >more legitimate than it is now.
>
> I think Joop has done a brilliant summary here and would suggest that
> the above be included in any report if there is widespread agreement
> with it.
>
> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html