Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH creation and constituencies' debate

[Luca Muscarà <muscara@unive.it>]

Greg Burton wrote:

> At 11:30 AM 1/15/01, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> >Do I have to resubmit all the arguments against constituencies, under the
> >correct headers?
>
> Of course not :)
>
> It seems to me we have three separate issues:
>
> 1. If constituencies are the electors for the NC - which they currently are
> - the creation of specific constituencies, like the proposed IDNH
> 2. If constituencies are the electors for the NC, how should constituencies
> be created?
> 3. Whether or not constituencies should continue as the electors for the NC
>
> I'm suggesting that work on creation of specific constituencies be moved to
> the GA list, but that doesn't affect 2 or 3. It seems to me that if we can
> focus on those two issues - in separate threads - we won't get as confused
> about which is which. None of that means reposting arguments already made,
> unless of course they need to be referenced currently.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Dear members,

after three weeks, it seems to me that this WG is often caught in between two
opposing ways of thinking: one that consists of an epistemological reflection
on the adequacy, fairness and democracy of current processes and procedures;
and another--more pragmatical and practical--that tries to find the best
solution not in absolute terms, but relative to the given timeframes and
contexts. Beside taking a lot of time and creating difficulties in managing
this WG for the Chairs, this dialectic should be considered IMHO one of the
main reasons of interest of this WG and should be to some extent preserved,
without harming of course the functioning of the whole process.

Regards to all,

Luca Muscarà


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html