Re: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Out of order gentlemen, in a majority one does not make a position, and then
move his own position, and hurredly seek a second.

May I suggest that the problem of "What is a consensus?",  be included as
something which must be addressed with a note that the method of determining
consensus is strongly questioned by a strong minority.

Sincerely,

Eric wrote:

> seconded
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Sotiropoulos
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:41 PM
> To: 'Greg Burton'; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...
>
> I believe "consensus" is a recipe for gang rule; the most powerful and
> organized gangs rule!
>
> Where is the pro-consensus platform's DEFINITION of a CONSENSUS?  After all,
> haven't they been the ones working by "consensus"?
>
> That there is a great dissent regarding the understanding of this term
> "consensus" within this WG... let *this* be logged in any report to COUNCIL
> (or shall
> we say *counsel*).
>
> I strenuously object to the idea of the suppression of any MAJORITY mandated
> State of Affairs and/or Government in any ORGANIZATION OF HUMAN
> BEINGS.  I think many people on this WG agree.  I call for a second.
>
> Hurry,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard