Re: [wg-review] Comments, second installment...

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:47:11PM -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
> Once again Mr. Crispiny your literary skills exceed this IDNH's ability to
> mitigate your most poinant points.  But once again I fear that your all to
> consistent logic is the undoing of your real point.

Perhaps you misunderstand my intent in posting my comments. 

The WG has the specific charter of collecting input for the Review Task
Force by the 15th.  I am presenting my input.  Like everyone else, I
also have the option of presenting that input directly to the Task
Force, but I thought I would try to add a bit to the volume of comments
coming from this WG.  Roeland Meyer also presented a document, the gTLD
registry constituency presented input, Register.com presented input. 
You have the option of doing so, as well.  It would have been much
better if there had been a lot more input, but people apparently have
other priorities. 

I presume YJ will collect the results of the various polls and prepare a
summary of the WG discussion for the TF.  I was trying to present a
coherent single set of comments that present goals that I think are
actually reachable, given what I know about reality, and I am presuming
that YJ will simply include my comments as an appendix, just as she has
with some others. 



-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html