Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

I'm down with Joop's suggestion of a new poll.

Let's vote.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.

1/16/01 2:48:31 PM, Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz> wrote:

>On 14:16 15/01/01 -0500, Sotiropoulos said:
>>1/15/01 10:05:12 AM, Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:
>>
>>>It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support
for us
>>>to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
>>
>>Actually Greg, I'd say that there was more widespread support for the
>dissolution of the constitency structure.  In fact it appears to be a
>majority, check it
>>out: http://pollcat.com/Lite/report.asp?report=report/tzk27voon5_a
>>
>
>This is an important point. Important enough for a more formal poll.
>With permission of the Chair, I will put up four more polling questions
in
>the Booth:
>
>1. Should in your opinion the constituency structure of the DNSO be
>abandoned altogether?
> Yes/No/ No opinion
>
>2. If the Constituency structure is retained, do you favour the
addition of
>an Individual DN Holder constituency?
>YES/NO
>
>3. If the  Constituency structure is retained, do you favour  a
reduction
>of NC seats belonging to the existing constituencies and redistribution
of
>seats in order to more evenly balance opposing interests?
>YES/NO/ other (please specify)
>
>4. If the Constituency structure is abandoned, how would you want to
>represent the Individual Domain Name holders on the Names Council?
>
>-not at all
>-turn the GA into an electoral college for the NC
>-other: please specify on the comment line
>(multiple choice possible)
>
>--Joop--
>www.idno.org

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html