Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 23:08 15/01/01 -0700, Greg Burton wrote:
>At 06:48 PM 1/15/01, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>>This is an important point. Important enough for a more formal poll.
>>With permission of the Chair, I will put up four more polling questions in
>>the Booth:
>
>I'd like to see these, with the following addition, and a question on 
>phrasing answered first.
>
>Since the motion referenced in the "Clean Motion" thread has been made and 
>seconded, I believe the first question should be whether or not the WG 
>wants to adopt that motion formally.
>
Yes. I forgot that one. However, if the my additional text is adopted for
inclusion in thre motion too, it should be in the original version.
(un-organized, rather than dis-organized)

>>1. Should in your opinion the constituency structure of the DNSO be 
>>abandoned altogether?
>>  Yes/No/ No opinion
>
>Do you mean here "the concept of formal constituencies" or "the election of 
>the NC by constituencies"? Those questions might lead to different results, 
>so phrasing is important.
>
Actually the phrasing of polling questions should be by "real consensus". :)
As this would take too much time, it is probably best to split the
question, so that each aspect can be addressed.

a. 1. Should in your opinion the concept of formal constituencies making up
structure of the DNSO be abandoned altogether?
Yes/No/ No opinion

b. Should in your opinion the election of the Names Council by
constituencies  be abandoned ?
Yes/No/ No opinion

>>2. If the Constituency structure is retained, do you favour the addition of
>>an Individual DN Holder constituency?
>>YES/NO
>>
>>3. If the  Constituency structure is retained, do you favour  a reduction
>>of NC seats belonging to the existing constituencies and redistribution of
>>seats in order to more evenly balance opposing interests?
>>YES/NO/ other (please specify)
>>
>>4. If the Constituency structure is abandoned, how would you want to
>>represent the Individual Domain Name holders on the Names Council?
>>
>>-not at all
>>-turn the GA into an electoral college for the NC
>>-other: please specify on the comment line
>>(multiple choice possible)
>
I will put these questions up and distribute additional passwords to all
newcomers to the WG. 


--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html