ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] Preliminary Report - 11. IDNH




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:11 AM
To: Greg Burton; wg Review list; YJ Park
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Preliminary Report - 11. IDNH


At 22:32 15/01/01 -0700, Greg Burton wrote:
[as part of the proposed text]

>Statement by Joop Teenstra clarifying the difference between an IDNH as a
>constituency of the DNSO and at-large membership in ICANN
>
>The @large is
>
>1. a disorganized group of all Internet users' diverse interests.

Uhm..., I said un-organized. Disorganized would be pejorative and such a
slur is not intended.
Great things may still come from efforts to organize the @large.

My mistake, sorry Joop. No slur intended. I honestly didn't appreciate the
full impact in this context until pointed out.
Joanna








--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>