Re: [wg-review] Re(2): [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSO byMr Park

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Thank you for this very helpful input.

Sandy Harris wrote:

> Roeland Meyer wrote:
>
> > ... However, the jargon problem (outlined elsewhere)
> > may be a much more insurmountable problem than the native language issue.
> > Over time, we are building a mountain of jargon, history, and evolution of
> > ideas, such that, even native American English speakers have a difficult
> > time following the discussions. At the least, a native language speaker can
> > find a translator of English. However, where is one to find a translator of
> > the jargon?
>
> Try the links at:
> http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.8/doc/glossary.html#gloss
>
> especially the glossary of networking terms:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1208.txt
>
> and the jargon file:
> http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/index.html
>
> which includes definition for common online acronyms like IMHO:
> http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/IMHO.html
>
> > ... I see this entire thread
> > as presenting an intractible problem. One that does not have a forseeable
> > solution-set. In marketing jargon, this is a rat-hole. Were WG-Review to
> > become embroiled in this problem, it will fail in its mission.
>
> Yes. This is not so much an issue for a DNSO review as for ICANN as a
> whole.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard