Re: [wg-review] Re(2): [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSOby Mr Park

[Robin Miller <robin@minervan.com>]

YJ Park wrote...

Together with its brief description on Review WG progress above
in the middle of holiday season, it is a great pleasure to let GA know
Review WG slowly approaches to the below issues.

> * the GA-Chair election method ... [snip]
> the petition from the GA (physical meeting) to the Board directly

> * Individual Constituency
> The eternal question: how to proceed in order to have *real* progress?


---

now, yes its DNSO review. But its also meant to address these two issues. Now
Mr. Lisse has implied only DNS operators really have a voice here. This is what
has some of us a little bit ticked off. Now what does exclusively catering to
ccTLD and DNS operators have to do with the above topics? Are they the only
ones whose opinions matter in an individuals constituency?

Robin

Roeland Meyer wrote:
> 
> I think that we need clarifacation and re-focusing from the chais here. The
> name of this WG is WG-Review. The ostensible charter is to review the
> performance, or lack thereof, of the DNSO, overall.
> 
> Am I wrong here?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Miller [mailto:robin@minervan.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:59 AM
> > To: el@lisse.na
> > Cc: Oscar A. Robles Garay; wg-review@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re(2): [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of
> > DNSO by Mr Park
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> >
> > > No, I think we need to actually identify the people responsible for
> > > the 240 odd ccTLDs and then try and contact them. I am
> > quite sure that
> > > many of the listed names are not involved in the management of their
> > > ccTLD.
> > >
> > > greetings, el
> >
> > This WG is about setting up an individuals constituency, not
> > about ccTLD
> > constituencies. Now if the ccTLD's are interested in aiding with the
> > translations, that's nice. But lets also be honest - DNS
> > operators are not the
> > only individuals this WG is trying to reach out to. My domain
> > owning friend in
> > Switzerland can barely understand English texts, and cannot
> > write in English.
> > So that means she is shut out of this kind of process. There
> > are many more
> > people like her, people like her that this WG is 'supposedly'
> > set up to reach
> > out to. This is not the WG for registries or just DNS
> > operators. Its the WG to
> > set up an individuals constituency.
> >
> >
> > Robin
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html